Re: pg_upgrade libraries check

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade libraries check
Date: 2012-05-29 09:11:37
Message-ID: 871um3uzau.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> is not going to happen. Putting shared libraries into a
> postgres-writable directory will be seen (correctly) as a security hole
> of the first magnitude, not to mention that in many systems it'd require
> root privilege anyway to adjust the dynamic linker's search path.

It seems I keep forgetting about security concerns. Thanks for the
heads-up, will try to think about something else then. Damn.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2012-05-29 09:28:12 Re: [RFC] Interface of Row Level Security
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2012-05-29 08:06:19 Re: Bogus nestloop rows estimate in 8.4.7