| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.2RC1 wraps this Thursday ... |
| Date: | 2012-08-21 20:03:12 |
| Message-ID: | 8702.1345579392@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> * Checkpointer process split broke fsync'ing
>> ** bug is fixed, but now we had better recheck earlier performance claims
>>
>> Is anyone actually going to do any performance testing on this?
> I am unlikely to have time between now and release.
Me either, and I didn't hear any other volunteers.
Even if testing showed that there was some performance regression,
I doubt that we would either revert the checkpointer process split or
hold up the release to look for another solution. So realistically this
is not a blocker issue. I'll move it to the "not blockers" section.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Gould | 2012-08-21 20:12:54 | Re: huge tlb support |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-08-21 18:58:30 | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |