Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing]

From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih(at)kpnQwest(dot)no>
To: matthew green <mrg(at)eterna(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ivan <ivan(at)420(dot)am>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Subject: Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing]
Date: 2001-04-08 18:20:47
Message-ID: 86puenl0cg.fsf@athene.i.eunet.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

matthew green <mrg(at)eterna(dot)com(dot)au> writes:

> i also believe the `Bad address' errors were caused when the test
> was run in an NFS mounted directory.

You may have something, there. My test run on the VAX was over NFS.
I set up NetBSD on a VAX specifically to test PostgreSQL 7.1, but I
didn't have any disk available that it could use, so I went for NFS.

-tih
--
The basic difference is this: hackers build things, crackers break them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nadim H Rabbani 2001-04-08 19:34:47 Postgress On Windows
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-04-08 18:06:16 Re: A more useful way to split the distribution