Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz)
To: "Chris Travers" <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
Cc: "Randolf Richardson" <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-11-29 13:58:20
Message-ID: 86llpzgttv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> writes:

Chris> The resulting situation is that MySQL has some licensing and
Chris> technical issues that make it a very bad fit for enterprise
Chris> use. PostgreSQL is both more free (in that closed source
Chris> programs can CONNECT to it) and technically ahead of MySQL. It
Chris> is also more rugged and performs better under real
Chris> circumstances. For this reason, I cannot think of a company
Chris> (aside from web hosting services) choosing MySQL over
Chris> PostgreSQL.

The biggest advantage MySQL still has over PostgreSQL is the same
advantage Microsoft has over Unix - entrenchment, both in
software and mindshare.

The marketplace often does the right thing, but when one "was right"
thing dominates the market, the "new right" thing rarely has an easy
time.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-11-29 14:04:06 Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments
Previous Message Randal L. Schwartz 2003-11-29 13:54:46 Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments