Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem

From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih(at)nhh(dot)no>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart), pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem
Date: 1998-08-28 07:38:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> This should all be fixed now.

Looks that way to me.  Thanks!

By the way, PostgreSQL somehow seems to have become significantly
faster for my use sometime over the last month or two.  For the select
and update queries I regularly execute, which generally involve two
or three tables and ditto indices, I'm seeing what feels like twice
the speed of what I got before -- and I've been increasing the amount
of data in my tables without any schema changes or index additions!

Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity.  --Niles Crane, "Frasier"

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andreas ZeugswetterDate: 1998-08-28 09:07:12
Subject: AW: AW: TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser)
Previous:From: Vadim MikheevDate: 1998-08-28 07:31:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY revisited

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group