Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem

From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih(at)nhh(dot)no>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart), pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] vacuum problem
Date: 1998-08-28 07:38:05
Message-ID: 86emu17e02.fsf@athene.nhh.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> This should all be fixed now.

Looks that way to me. Thanks!

By the way, PostgreSQL somehow seems to have become significantly
faster for my use sometime over the last month or two. For the select
and update queries I regularly execute, which generally involve two
or three tables and ditto indices, I'm seeing what feels like twice
the speed of what I got before -- and I've been increasing the amount
of data in my tables without any schema changes or index additions!

-tih
--
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity. --Niles Crane, "Frasier"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Zeugswetter 1998-08-28 09:07:12 AW: AW: TODO (was: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with parser)
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-08-28 07:31:55 Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY revisited