Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising the SCRAM iteration count
Date: 2023-02-22 17:21:03
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/22/23 8:39 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 17 Dec 2022, at 04:27, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

>> Superuser-only GUCs should be documented as such, or do you intend to
>> make it user-settable like I suggested upthread :) ?
> I don't really have strong feelings, so I reverted to being user-settable since
> I can't really present a strong argument for superuser-only.

I was going to present some weak arguments, but not worth it. Anything
around using up CPU cycles would be true of just writing plain old queries.

> The attached is a rebase on top of master with no other additional hacking done
> on top of the above review comments.

Generally LGTM. I read through earlier comments (sorry I missed
replying) and have nothing to add or object to.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2023-02-22 17:27:19 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2023-02-22 17:18:34 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners