FW:

From: "Orhan Aglagul" <oaglagul(at)cittio(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: FW:
Date: 2007-05-09 01:14:14
Message-ID: 868BCE5A6576F44A862F1FBBC3E14A0104255AFA@ms17.mse9.exchange.ms
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


No, it is one transaction per insert.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 5:38 PM
To: Orhan Aglagul
Subject: RE: [PERFORM]

On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 19:36, Orhan Aglagul wrote:
> But 10,000 records in 65 sec comes to ~153 records per second. On a
dual
> 3.06 Xeon....
> What range is acceptable?

If you're doing that in one big transaction, that's horrible. Because
it shouldn't be waiting for each insert to fsync, but the whole
transaction.

Responses

  • Re: FW: at 2007-05-09 01:22:45 from david

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message david 2007-05-09 01:22:45 Re: FW:
Previous Message Orhan Aglagul 2007-05-09 01:13:53 FW: