| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #11829: pgcrypto doc bug |
| Date: | 2014-11-03 15:47:38 |
| Message-ID: | 8688.1415029658@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:50:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A look at set_arg() suggests that the spelling of that option is really
>> "sess-key" ... Marko, is that correct?
> Yes.
Will fix.
>> I also notice that there are a bunch of undocumented options with
>> names beginning "expect-". Should those be documented, and if so
>> could we get some text for that?
> They are mainly meant for regtests, to see if final message structure
> is what is expected. I don't see much value for users.
OK, thanks for checking. I see we're not documenting the "debug"
option either, so this seems sensible, though perhaps a comment in
the code is warranted.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sven Wegener | 2014-11-03 17:15:04 | COPY TO returning empty result with parallel ALTER TABLE |
| Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2014-11-03 15:36:15 | Re: BUG #11829: pgcrypto doc bug |