Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message.

From: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message.
Date: 2019-11-08 09:19:01
Message-ID: 867ecdbf-6a66-f5f6-8148-146a8d7da052@darold.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Michael,

Le 08/11/2019 à 10:05, Michael Paquier a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 05:25:52PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> Pushed after modifying the commit message a bit. Thanks!
> Should we have more tests for 2PC then?
> --
> Michael

I don't think so. The support or not of 2PC is on foreign data wrapper
side. In postgres_fdw contrib the error for use with 2PC is not part of
the test but it will be thrown anyway. I guess that a test will be
valuable only if there is support for readonly query.

--
Gilles Darold

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2019-11-08 09:20:03 Re: Collation versioning
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-08 09:07:57 Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line