Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Date: 2010-09-14 17:28:08
Message-ID: 8676.1284485288@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I think there's hardly much of interest in that branch, so it doesn't
> make sense to waste too much effort on it. However, why would we delete
> it? Just keep it with the manufactured tag and all -- so it is there,
> even if the history is not all that clean. This _is_ an option, right?

That was pretty much my default position; I was just wondering if there
was a consensus to do something else.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-09-14 17:32:11 Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-09-14 17:21:57 Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Selena Deckelmann 2010-09-14 18:11:26 Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-09-14 17:21:57 Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion