From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
Date: | 2010-09-14 17:28:08 |
Message-ID: | 8676.1284485288@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I think there's hardly much of interest in that branch, so it doesn't
> make sense to waste too much effort on it. However, why would we delete
> it? Just keep it with the manufactured tag and all -- so it is there,
> even if the history is not all that clean. This _is_ an option, right?
That was pretty much my default position; I was just wondering if there
was a consensus to do something else.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-09-14 17:32:11 | Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-09-14 17:21:57 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2010-09-14 18:11:26 | Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-09-14 17:21:57 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |