| From: | merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz) |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Matthias(dot)Pitzl(at)izb(dot)de, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql 8.1: plperl code works with LATIN1, fail |
| Date: | 2007-01-29 15:38:31 |
| Message-ID: | 8664apders.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
Michael> Isn't that the situation here? The PL/Perl function body is a
Michael> string encoded in the database's encoding, which in this case is
Michael> UTF-8.
If that's always the case, then the embedded Perl interpreter should
be started in that mode, perhaps by adding "-Mutf8" to the arg list
of the embedded interpreter.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-29 15:51:03 | Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql? |
| Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2007-01-29 15:16:17 | Re: Limit on number of users in postgresql? |