Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?

From: Jennifer Trey <jennifer(dot)trey(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Ashish Karalkar <ashishka(at)synechron(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?
Date: 2009-03-30 18:36:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
I am sorry, but it seems that I replied to only one of you instead of to the
mailing list.
I am just about to install a version on my "Server computer" (Windows web
server 2008 x64) and I am stuck on what I should go with.

I have been developing on the standard postgreSQL but like that the
EnterpriseDB webpage claims that "Standard Plus" is faster.

Is there something that will work differently, more complex with that
version? Not free, or similar? Something I should know? Why would they give
out a better version, if both are free??? There is something fishy going on

Thanks / Jennifer

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:19 +0530, Ashish Karalkar wrote:
> > Postgres Plus does support  Linux and it includes all the PostgreSQL
> > features as well as have many other additional useful features.One of
> > which is its dyna tune module.
> Yes it does, but it doesn't use native packages (as far as I know).
> Meaning, it doesn't use RPM or DEB.
> Joshua D. Drake
> --
> PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
>   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
>   503-667-4564 -
>   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Adrian KlaverDate: 2009-03-30 18:38:07
Subject: Re: running two clusters on one machine
Previous:From: Michael BlackDate: 2009-03-30 18:33:44
Subject: FW: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group