| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation weirdness |
| Date: | 2026-03-02 18:42:26 |
| Message-ID: | 862277.1772476946@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Monday, March 2, 2026, Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> wrote:
>> Would it be possible to set (column constraint) and (table constraint)
>> in the normal body font instead of monospace? That would make it clearer
>> that these phrases aren't part of the syntax but descriptive.
> Not sure, but I don’t like that as the sole solution anyway. Too subtle.
Agreed, but we could/should do it along with modifying the text.
I thought your addition of "variant" was a good idea.
I didn't look closely at the rest of your diff.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2026-03-02 23:27:35 | Re: Documentation weirdness |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2026-03-02 18:36:09 | Re: Documentation weirdness |