| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Julian Scarfe" <julian(at)avbrief(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance, unique keys and performance |
| Date: | 2008-01-13 20:47:50 |
| Message-ID: | 8606.1200257270@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Julian Scarfe" <julian(at)avbrief(dot)com> writes:
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>> The
>> problem you've got is that you need a nestloop-with-inner-indexscan
>> plan type, where the inner side is an Append group (that is, an
>> inheritance tree) --- and 8.1 doesn't know how to create such a plan.
>> If you can update to 8.2 or later it should get better.
> Isn't test 3 (scalar subqueries) also a nestloop-with-inner-indexscan with
> an inner Append?
No. The subquery is planned separately and sees the upper query's
variable as a pseudo-constant Param. In neither query does the
planner think that a join is happening.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian Weimer | 2008-01-14 08:27:52 | Re: Best way to index IP data? |
| Previous Message | Julian Scarfe | 2008-01-13 19:28:18 | Re: Inheritance, unique keys and performance |