Re: Inheritance, unique keys and performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Julian Scarfe" <julian(at)avbrief(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inheritance, unique keys and performance
Date: 2008-01-13 20:47:50
Message-ID: 8606.1200257270@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Julian Scarfe" <julian(at)avbrief(dot)com> writes:
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>> The
>> problem you've got is that you need a nestloop-with-inner-indexscan
>> plan type, where the inner side is an Append group (that is, an
>> inheritance tree) --- and 8.1 doesn't know how to create such a plan.
>> If you can update to 8.2 or later it should get better.

> Isn't test 3 (scalar subqueries) also a nestloop-with-inner-indexscan with
> an inner Append?

No. The subquery is planned separately and sees the upper query's
variable as a pseudo-constant Param. In neither query does the
planner think that a join is happening.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Weimer 2008-01-14 08:27:52 Re: Best way to index IP data?
Previous Message Julian Scarfe 2008-01-13 19:28:18 Re: Inheritance, unique keys and performance