| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Hou, Zhijie" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32 |
| Date: | 2020-12-03 09:24:03 |
| Message-ID: | 859a7b20-9b4c-0add-6704-6fc5ef4ef9e1@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-11-30 16:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Nov-30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> Patch updated this way. I agree it's better that way.
>
> Thanks, LGTM.
For a change like this, do we need to change the C symbol names, so that
there is no misbehavior if the shared library is not updated at the same
time as the extension is upgraded in SQL?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-12-03 09:27:08 | Single transaction in the tablesync worker? |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2020-12-03 08:57:22 | Re: Multi Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS - revived patch |