| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Duncan Sands <duncan(dot)sands(at)deepbluecap(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 |
| Date: | 2025-06-24 04:34:26 |
| Message-ID: | 859850.1750739666@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 1:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> There is something not right about the v13 version of this patch.
> Yes. We've discussed how to fix this test failure and I proposed the
> patch for that[1]. If there is no comment and objection, I'm going to
> push it to v13.
Oh, my apologies for not having kept up on that thread!
Both of the proposed patches seem like band-aids, but I'm not
sure that it's worth working harder on a branch that has only
a few months to live. I'm okay with either solution.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-06-24 04:58:43 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-06-24 04:22:53 | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 |