| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Using defines for protocol characters |
| Date: | 2023-08-07 20:02:08 |
| Message-ID: | 859245.1691438528@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 at 12:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> PqMsgEmptyQueryResponse or something like that seems better, if we
>> want to keep the current capitalization. I'm not a huge fan of the way
>> we vary our capitalization conventions so much all over the code base,
>> but I think we would at least do well to keep it consistent from one
>> end of a certain identifier to the other.
> I don't have a strong preference, but before I make the changes I'd like to
> get consensus.
> Can we vote or whatever it takes to decide on a naming pattern that is
> acceptable ?
I'm good with Robert's proposal above.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-08-07 20:31:02 | Re: Configurable FP_LOCK_SLOTS_PER_BACKEND |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2023-08-07 20:00:25 | Re: Using defines for protocol characters |