| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Date: | 2008-05-07 16:20:04 |
| Message-ID: | 8588.1210177204@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-www |
"Matthew T. O'connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> Patches are an integral part of the conversation about development, I
> think trying to split them up is awkward at best. Do people really
> still think that the potential for larger messages is really a problem?
Personally I'd be fine with abandoning -patches and just using -hackers.
We could try it for awhile, anyway, and go back if it seems worse.
> By the way, what is the actual size limit on hackers vs patches.
They do have different size limits; we'd have to raise the limit on
-hackers if we do this. Marc would know exactly what the limits are.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-05-07 16:21:13 | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2008-05-07 16:15:36 | Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-05-07 16:21:13 | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-07 16:06:40 | Re: [NOVICE] encoding problems |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-05-07 16:21:13 | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'connor | 2008-05-07 15:54:08 | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |