Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Date: 2005-10-25 02:40:32
Message-ID: 8582.1130208032@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> OK, running the latest patch. Observations:
> ...
> I ran tests for about an hour, randomly killing/canceling backends
> without any problems.

Are we all comfortable that
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php
is OK to apply?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-25 02:43:16 Re: [GENERAL] 'a' == 'a '
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-10-25 02:15:43 Re: Seeing context switch storm with 10/13 snapshot of