Re: Ltree syntax improvement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>
Subject: Re: Ltree syntax improvement
Date: 2020-04-01 23:46:50
Message-ID: 8570.1585784810@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> [ latest version of ltree syntax extension ]

This is going to need another rebase after all the other ltree hacking
that just got done. However, I did include 0001 (use a switch) in
the commit I just pushed, so you don't need to worry about that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-04-01 23:57:32 Re: Proposal: Expose oldest xmin as SQL function for monitoring
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-04-01 23:09:19 Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more.