Re: Are there any performance penalty for opposite edian platform combinations....

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: guoping(dot)zhang(at)nec(dot)com(dot)au
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are there any performance penalty for opposite edian platform combinations....
Date: 2006-08-01 12:10:34
Message-ID: 857.1154434234@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Guoping Zhang" <guoping(dot)zhang(at)nec(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> In fact, it is a general question that "Is it a good practice we shall avoid
> to run application server and database server on the platform with opposite
> edian? or it simply doesn't matter"?

Our network protocol uses big-endian consistently, so there will be some
tiny hit for little-endian machines, independently of what's on the
other end of the wire. I can't imagine you could measure the difference
though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ernest Nishiseki 2006-08-01 13:09:04 Re: Fwd: Savepoint performance
Previous Message Florian Weimer 2006-08-01 07:28:05 Re: Performances with new Intel Core* processors