RE: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Date: 2001-02-14 08:28:06
Message-ID: 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A2999@woody.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 14 February 2001 06:29
> To: Cedar Cox
> Cc: 'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
>
>
> > > > I am not sure how much that confuses things.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Surely just a copy of the full installshield installation
> on the ftp server
> > > would suffice (and wouldn't exactly eat disk space!).
> >
> > Where would one get the source for this "unsupported"
> driver? (..not that
> > I care). Being open source software, I'd hate to see
> something binary
> > only..
> >
>
> Compatibility is back in the ODBC driver source code.
>

Not that I'm questioning your wisdom Bruce :-) but I got the impression that
most people who commented on this issue thought that removal of the code was
the better option to keep things tidy. Did I miss something?

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-14 08:45:45 Re: [ODBC] ODBC <6.4 protocol
Previous Message Dave Page 2001-02-14 08:13:21 RE: [ODBC] ODBC <6.4 protocol