Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query

From: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query
Date: 2018-07-06 20:56:22
Message-ID: 8551641530910582@myt5-9da6df248f4a.qloud-c.yandex.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

06.07.2018, 22:35, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>  Hmm... so pg_stat_statements_reset() is allowed to be executed by
>>  pg_read_all_stats role while other stats reset functions like
>>  pg_stat_reset() can be executed only by superusers. Which looks
>>  strange and inconsistent to me.
>
> Yeah, why would a pg_READ_all_stats role let you change stuff?

+1, personally i was surprised first time. But I thought that it was discussed before committing version 1.5
I read original thread [1] and, as far i see, pg_stat_statements_reset change was not discussed.

Let's remove this grant?
Or grant to pg_monitor role instead of pg_read_all_stats?

regards, Sergei

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+OCxoyRdsc1xyLfF9s698gUGyPXBs4CvJ+0Gwo8U65NmYJ7pw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-07-06 21:08:02 Re: Let's remove DSM_IMPL_NONE.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-07-06 20:52:14 Re: [PATCH] Use access() to check file existence in GetNewRelFileNode().