| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
| Date: | 2017-07-25 15:32:03 |
| Message-ID: | 8530.1500996723@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hm, I had the idea that we were already asking ExtUtils::Embed for that,
>> but now I see we only inquire about LDFLAGS not CCFLAGS. Yes, this sounds
>> like a promising avenue to pursue.
>>
>> It would be useful to see the results of
>> perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts
>> on one of the affected installations, and compare that to the problematic
>> field(s).
> Why ccopts rather than ccflags?
I was looking at the current code which fetches ldopts, and analogizing.
Don't know the difference between ccflags and ccopts.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-07-25 15:35:37 | Re: Testlib.pm vs msys |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-07-25 15:29:40 | Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |