Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Matthias Kurz <m(dot)kurz(at)irregular(dot)at>, Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE
Date: 2022-03-22 21:37:50
Message-ID: 8500cf09-d5eb-eafe-4794-25b0a377a3ce@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 3/22/22 11:27, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 3/22/22 10:53, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2022-Mar-22, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>> I'm planning on pushing the functions patch set this week and json-table
>>> next week.
>> I think it'd be a good idea to push the patches one by one and let a day
>> between each. That would make it easier to chase buildfarm issues
>> individually, and make sure they are fixed before the next step.
>> Each patch in each series is already big enough.
>
>
> OK, can do it that way. First one will be later today then.
>
>

OK, pushed the first of the functions patches. That means the cfbot will
break on these two CF items, but it's way too much trouble to have to
remake the patch sets every day, so we can just live without the cfbot
on these for a bit. I will of course test before committing and fix any
bitrot.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2022-03-22 21:42:53 Re: Optimize external TOAST storage
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-22 20:55:49 Re: MDAM techniques and Index Skip Scan patch