Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!

From: Amitabh Kant <amitabhkant(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!
Date: 2010-02-09 17:37:21
Message-ID: 84b68b3d1002090937r774bb46ds7ab110c6f66cef70@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov
> wrote:

> Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc> wrote:
> File system is xfs noatime,nobarrier for all data; OS is on ext3. I
> *think* the pg_xlog mirrored pair is hanging off the same
> BBU-writeback controller as the big RAID, but I'd have to track down
> the hardware tech to confirm, and he's out today. System has 16
> Xeon CPUs and 64 GB RAM.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
Hi Kevin

Just curious if you have a 16 physical CPU's or 16 cores on 4 CPU/8 cores
over 2 CPU with HT.

With regards

Amitabh Kant

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-02-09 17:44:42 Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-02-09 16:33:01 Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!