Re: Query performance

From: "Hakan Kocaman" <Hakan(dot)Kocaman(at)digame(dot)de>
To: "Christian Rengstl" <Christian(dot)Rengstl(at)klinik(dot)uni-regensburg(dot)de>, "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Query performance
Date: 2006-08-03 09:36:39
Message-ID: 84AAD313D71B1D4F9EE20E739CC3B6ED0116180F@ATLANTIK-CL.intern.digame.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

maybe you should overthink your db-design, but thats a bit premature whithout your complete
table-definitions(including table-names, datatypes, indexes, foreign-key constraints,etc.)

If your are using pgadmin3 just cut'n paste the content of the window on the bottom left for
the corresponding tables.

If you're using psql try \d yur-table-name.

Best regards

Hakan Kocaman
Software-Development

digame.de GmbH
Richard-Byrd-Str. 4-8
50829 Köln

Tel.: +49 (0) 221 59 68 88 31
Fax: +49 (0) 221 59 68 88 98
Email: hakan(dot)kocaman(at)digame(dot)de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Rengstl
> [mailto:Christian(dot)Rengstl(at)klinik(dot)uni-regensburg(dot)de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:18 AM
> To: Richard Huxton; Hakan Kocaman
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Query performance
>
>
> Hi,
>
> i would rather compare int4 too, but the snp_id can be
> something like "abc123" unfortunately.
>
> "Hakan Kocaman" <Hakan(dot)Kocaman(at)digame(dot)de> wrote on 08/03/06 11:08 am:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Richard Huxton [mailto:dev(at)archonet(dot)com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:00 AM
> >> To: Christian Rengstl
> >> Cc: Hakan Kocaman; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Query performance
> >>
> >>
> >> Christian Rengstl wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > the complete query is the one i posted, but here comes the
> >> schema for mytable:
> >> > entry_no int8 NOT NULL DEFAULT
> nextval('entry_no_seq''::regclass),
> >> > pid varchar(15) NOT NULL,
> >> > crit varchar(13) NOT NULL,
> >> > val1 varchar(1),
> >> > val2 varchar(1),
> >> > aendat text,
> >> > aennam varchar(8),
> >> > CONSTRAINT "PK_ENTRY" PRIMARY KEY (entry_no)
> >> >
> >> > myCritTable:
> >> > crit varchar(13) NOT NULL,
> >> > chr int2,
> >> > aendat timestamp,
> >> > CONSTRAINT pk_crit_master PRIMARY KEY (crit)
> >>
> >> Still doesn't match the EXPLAIN output - where's snp_id?
> >> Where's table
> >> test2?
> >>
> >
> > Yep, that bothered me too.
> >
> >> > My server is 8.1.4. As a matter of fact, i have no idea
> >> where the text
> >> > type comes from, because as you can see from above
> there are only
> >> > varchar with maximum 15 characters.
> >>
> >> PG is casting it to text. There's no real difference between
> >> the types
> >> (other than the size limit) and it's not expensive.
> >
> > But wouldn't a comparison between int4 be much cheaper.
> > If i see smth like "id" (here snp_id) in a fieldname it should be a
> > int-type, i think.
> >
> >>
> >> > "Hakan Kocaman" <Hakan(dot)Kocaman(at)digame(dot)de> wrote on 08/03/06
> >> 10:34 am:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> can you post the complete query,schema- and
> >> >> table-definition,server-version etc. ?
> >> >> This will help to identity the main problem.
> >> >>
> >> >> So at the moment i'm just guessing:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hash Cond: (("outer".snp_id)::text = ("inner".snp_id)::text)
> >> >> -> Bitmap Heap Scan on test2 (cost=232.92..132766.66
> >> rows=37120
> >> >> width=23)
> >> >> (actual time=291.600..356707.737 rows=37539 loops=1)
> >> >> This part is very expensive, but i got no clue why.
> >>
> >> Yep, it looks like the "Bitmap Heap Scan" is at the heart of
> >> this. You
> >> might want to increase work_mem, it could be that the bitmap
> >> is spilling
> >> to disk (which is much slower than keeping it all in RAM)
> >>
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/runtime-config-resou
> > rce.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-RESOURCE-MEMORY
> >
> > If it's still at 1MB (1024), try 5MB, 10MB, 50MB and see
> what happens.
> >
> > --
> > Richard Huxton
> > Archonet Ltd
> >
> >
> >
> > Hakan Kocaman
> > Software-Development
> >
> > digame.de GmbH
> > Richard-Byrd-Str. 4-8
> > 50829 Köln
> >
> > Tel.: +49 (0) 221 59 68 88 31
> > Fax: +49 (0) 221 59 68 88 98
> > Email: hakan(dot)kocaman(at)digame(dot)de
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> > choose an index scan if your joining column's
> datatypes do not
> > match
>
>
> --
> Christian Rengstl M.A.
> Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II
> Kardiologie - Forschung
> Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
> B3 1.388
> Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11
> 93053 Regensburg
> Tel.: +49-941-944-7230
>
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Mair 2006-08-03 09:57:06 Re: Query performance
Previous Message Christian Rengstl 2006-08-03 09:17:43 Re: Query performance