| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: buildfarm notifications |
| Date: | 2005-06-18 21:44:56 |
| Message-ID: | 8452.1119131096@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> comments welcome (buildfarm exists to help people on this list - if you
> want something speak up).
There are a number of buildfarm machines that don't seem to have *ever*
posted a successful run. In some cases this represents a genuine
portability issue but in others it looks more like local
misconfiguration. Can we do something to encourage people to fix these?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-18 21:54:18 | Re: hashtable crash (was Re: [PATCHES] Post-mortem: final |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2005-06-18 21:43:46 | Re: Post-mortem: final 2PC patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-18 21:54:18 | Re: hashtable crash (was Re: [PATCHES] Post-mortem: final |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2005-06-18 21:43:46 | Re: Post-mortem: final 2PC patch |