Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering

From: Alan McKay <alan(dot)mckay(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering
Date: 2009-05-27 19:33:55
Message-ID: 844129e80905271233q33d24549sf56ed1a8b2164a35@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

> Continuent works (AFAIK) like pgpool clustering, it sends the same
> statements to both/all servers in the cluster but it has no insight to the
> servers beyond this, so if via a direct connection server A becomes out of
> sync with server B then continuent is oblivious.

So can the same be said for pgpool then?

thanks,
-Alan

--
“Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.”
- Glenn Prickett

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Kempter 2009-05-27 19:41:40 Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-27 19:28:11 Re: Bloated Table

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Kempter 2009-05-27 19:41:40 Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering
Previous Message Alan McKay 2009-05-27 19:13:28 Re: Postgres Clustering