| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Srini Raghavan" <sixersrini(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Database file copy |
| Date: | 2011-01-14 18:03:22 |
| Message-ID: | 8429.1295028202@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The reason for wanting to deprecate and ultimately remove that
>> syntax is so we can get rid of FREEZE as a reserved word.
> Oh, OK. I can go along with that. If we're going that route,
> though, shouldn't we be getting support for the new syntax added, so
> there can be a release or two supporting both?
You mean like 9.0?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-14 18:06:03 | Re: limiting hint bit I/O |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-01-14 18:02:00 | Re: limiting hint bit I/O |