Re: darwin pgsql patches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: darwin pgsql patches
Date: 2000-11-29 22:35:27
Message-ID: 8411.975537327@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com> writes:
>> Here the question was why the existing powerpc code doesn't work. There
>> are only syntax differences. Any idea?

> I think it has more to do with Apple's forked gcc than anything
> else. I don't have a LinuxPPC machine to check if adding the rX syntax
> there would continue to work.

I do (have a LinuxPPC machine), so if you'd identify exactly what I
should try, I'll be glad to check this point. Seems like it'd be smart
to minimize the number of PPC variants of this routine.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-29 23:07:16 Re: darwin pgsql patches
Previous Message Peter Bierman 2000-11-29 22:21:03 Re: darwin pgsql patches