Re: walreceiver fallback_application_name

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: walreceiver fallback_application_name
Date: 2011-01-16 16:29:24
Message-ID: 8386.1295195364@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Since we now show the application name in pg_stat_replication, I think
> it would make sense to have the walreceiver set
> fallback_application_name on the connection string, like so:

Seems reasonable, but "postgres" is a mighty poor choice of name
for that, no? I don't have any really great substitute suggestion
--- best I can do offhand is "walreceiver" --- but "postgres" seems
uselessly generic, not to mention potentially confusing compared
to the default superuser name for instance.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-16 16:34:31 Re: ToDo List Item - System Table Index Clustering
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-16 16:25:37 Re: replication and pg_hba.conf