Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles

On 3/28/22 15:56, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:15 PM Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> Robert -- any opinion on this? If I am not mistaken it is code that you
>> are actively working on.
>
> Woops, I only just saw this. I don't mind if you want to change the
> calls to is_member_of_role() in basebackup_server.c and
> basebackup_to_shell.c to has_privs_of_role().

Done as originally posted.

> On that last note, I did not find basebackup_to_shell.required_role
> documented at all, and did not attempt to fix that.

I saw that Robert added documentation and it already reads correctly I
believe, except possibly an unrelated issue:

8<--------------
<para>
A role which replication whose privileges users are required to
possess
in order to make use of the <literal>shell</literal> backup target.
If this is not set, any replication user may make use of the
<literal>shell</literal> backup target.
</para>
8<--------------

Robert, should that actually be:
s/role which replication/role with replication/
?

Joe