Re: GiST patches for 7.2 (please apply)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)stack(dot)net>
Subject: Re: GiST patches for 7.2 (please apply)
Date: 2001-08-22 15:39:52
Message-ID: 8351.998494792@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Looking at the revised version of initGISTstate, I am thinking that
I missed a step in updating the main indexing code for the new
pg_opclass definition. It seems to me that if opckeytype is not 0,
that datatype ought to be used to declare the index column type from
the beginning. Then initGISTstate wouldn't need to go through all
these pushups to develop a correct tuple descriptor for the index.

Any objections?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-22 15:50:32 Re: Locale by default?
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-08-22 15:22:09 Re: List response time...