| From: | Jan Claeys <lists(at)janc(dot)be> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Client-server communication for FETCH |
| Date: | 2025-12-05 09:08:53 |
| Message-ID: | 8350a74f301180a0e5449da5a97d837800e4d6fa.camel@janc.be |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 14:45 -0500, Tim Fors wrote:
> Do you have any further thoughts re: addressing this requirement
> (client-side cursor support)? Is this a requirement that the PGSQL
> community would consider implementing in libpq? Without it, it seems
> like a huge impediment to adoption of PGSQL for COBOL applications,
> and as you probably know, COBOL applications are still very
> pervasive. (C programs using ECPG would of course hit the same issue,
> so it's not just a COBOL-specific problem.)
Sounds to me like this ought to be implemented in ECPG and/or its COBOL
equivalent, not in libpq?
That's where the "Embedded SQL" is implemented after all, and also the
equivalent of where Oracle implements its PREFETCH, I think?
And I suppose nobody would be opposed to such improvements, if someone
contributes them or pays for their development...
--
Jan Claeys
(please don't CC me when replying to the list)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | MentionTheElephant | 2025-12-05 10:30:38 | Seeking guidance on extremely slow pg_restore despite strong I/O performance |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2025-12-05 06:50:25 | Re: proposal: schema variables |