| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Emmanuel Sibi <emmanuelsibi(dot)mec(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] PostgreSQL crashes with ThreadSanitizer during early initialization |
| Date: | 2025-11-05 16:05:00 |
| Message-ID: | 834358.1762358700@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 5:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Assuming that works for Emmanuel, we could wrap it in a
>> pg_disable_sanitizer_instrumentation macro, or just use it
>> as-is. I don't have a strong preference --- any thoughts?
> No preference on my end. (If a second place to use it pops up, we
> could wrap it then.)
Yeah, that's what I concluded after sleeping on it. Right now
it seems unlikely that there will be more usages, so adding a
macro in c.h would just slow down the build (admittedly only
microscopically) for no gain. If we find additional usages
then we can revisit that tradeoff.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Alger | 2025-11-05 16:21:48 | Re: [PATCH] Add pretty formatting to pg_get_triggerdef |
| Previous Message | Paul A Jungwirth | 2025-11-05 16:04:21 | Re: SQL:2011 Application Time Update & Delete |