Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-07 12:39:48
Message-ID: 82pr6r7yaz.fsf@mid.bfk.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Dimitri Fontaine:

> Well we have JSON and agreed it was a good idea to have it. Now JSON is
> a subset of YAML and some would prefer another YAML style (me included).

YAML is rather difficult to parse, and most parsers assume a trusted
document source because they support arbitrary class instantiations
(and it's not possible to switch this off, or it's rather involved to
do so).

Plain JSON doesn't have this issue.

--
Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 黄晓骋 2009-12-07 12:50:43 some questions in postgresql developping
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2009-12-07 12:29:10 Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management