|From:||Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>|
|To:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: SEARCH and CYCLE clauses|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 2/22/21 9:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 22.05.20 14:32, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> As an improvement over the spec, I think the vast majority of people
>>> will be using simple true/false values. Can we make that optional?
>>> CYCLE f, t SET is_cycle USING path
>>> would be the same as
>>> CYCLE f, t SET is_cycle TO true DEFAULT false USING path
>> I was also considering that. It would be an easy change to make.
> This change has been accepted into the SQL:202x draft.
> Here is a patch for it.
This looks good to me, except that you forgot to add the feature stamp.
Attached is a small diff to apply on top of your patch to fix that.
|Next Message||Önder Kalacı||2021-02-22 10:45:11||Re: row filtering for logical replication|
|Previous Message||Amit Kapila||2021-02-22 09:41:28||Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions|