Re: pg_stat_have_stats() returns true for dropped indexes (or for index creation transaction rolled back)

From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_have_stats() returns true for dropped indexes (or for index creation transaction rolled back)
Date: 2022-09-26 13:28:16
Message-ID: 82877387-6737-3f82-118a-591d39bc2f5e@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 9/26/22 10:23 AM, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/23/22 10:45 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2022-09-01 08:40:54 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>>> Thanks for the suggestion, I'm coming up with this proposal in v4
>>> attached:
>>
>> I pushed the bugfix / related test portion to 15, master. Thanks!
>
> Thanks!
>

Forgot to say that with that being fixed, I'll come back with a patch
proposal for the tables/indexes stats split (discovered the issue fixed
in this current thread while working on the split patch.)

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2022-09-26 13:29:39 Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2022-09-26 13:09:40 Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation