| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: linked list rewrite |
| Date: | 2004-03-24 00:05:37 |
| Message-ID: | 8282.1080086737@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> lcons no change
>> lconsi lcons_int
>> lconso lcons_oid
> Should these be lnew or something clearer than cons-truct?
No, lcons is one of the names that I think we should stick with on
historical grounds. It's widely used in the backend and it has the
right connotations for anyone who's ever used Lisp. "lnew" conveys
nothing, certainly not the right thing (it doesn't make a new List,
only a new ListCell).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | wespvp | 2004-03-24 01:22:32 | Re: Solaris ecpg program doesn't work - pulling my hair |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-24 00:00:59 | Re: linked list rewrite |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Tillotson | 2004-03-24 00:30:21 | where can I get the HTML docs |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-24 00:00:59 | Re: linked list rewrite |