Re: Partial Index Too Literal?

From: Lennin Caro <lennin(dot)caro(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Phillip Mills <pmills(at)systemcore(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Partial Index Too Literal?
Date: 2008-06-26 20:08:21
Message-ID: 826979.41723.qm@web59508.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

use this

explain analyze select * from result where active = 't';

--- On Thu, 6/26/08, Phillip Mills <pmills(at)systemcore(dot)ca> wrote:
From: Phillip Mills <pmills(at)systemcore(dot)ca>
Subject: [GENERAL] Partial Index Too Literal?
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:24 PM

Under somewhat unusual circumstances, rows in one of our tables have an 'active' flag with a true value.  We check for these relatively often since they represent cases that need special handling.  We've found through testing that having a partial index on that field works well.  What seems odd to me, however, is that the index gets used only if the query is a textual match for how the index was specified.

That is, using an index defined as 'where active = true':
dev=# explain analyze select * from result where active = true;
                                                             QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Bitmap Heap Scan on result (cost=5.31..472.34 rows=4206 width=1126) (actual time=7.868..7.868 rows=0 loops=1)
   Filter: active
   ->  Bitmap Index Scan on result_active_idx  (cost=0.00..4.26 rows=2103 width=0) (actual time=4.138..4.138 rows=16625 loops=1)

         Index Cond: (active = true)
 Total runtime: 7.918 ms
(5 rows)

dev=# explain analyze select * from result where active is true;
                                                  QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Seq Scan on result (cost=0.00..537.26 rows=4263 width=1126) (actual time=55.631..55.631 rows=0 loops=1)
   Filter: (active IS TRUE)
 Total runtime: 55.668 ms
(3 rows)

This is version 8.2.6.  Is there something I'm missing that could make these queries ever produce different results?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert James 2008-06-26 20:28:45 Undocumented Postgres error: "failed to fetch old tuple for AFTER trigger"
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-06-26 19:50:59 Re: Partial Index Too Literal?