Re: Idea: Avoid JOINs by using path expressions to follow FKs

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021, at 20:53, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 3/29/21 7:55 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> > Do you know if REF is meant to be a replacement for foreign keys?
> >
> > Are they a different thing meant to co-exist with foreign keys,
> > or are they actually foreign keys "under the hood"
> > or something else entirely?
>
> They're supposed to be OOP where each row in the typed table is an
> instance of the object. Types can also have methods associated with
> them, and the instance tables can have subtables similar to our table
> inheritance. The dereference operator is replaced by a subquery.
>
> There is a whole slew of things in this area of the standard that
> apparently never caught on.

Hmm. Since it never caught on, maybe it was partly due to too much complexity, and maybe can invent a simpler solution?

I would also be against this idea if the complexity cost would be too high,
but I think Tom's foreign key constraint name idea looks fruitful since it's simple and non-invasive.

/Joel