| From: | James Olin Oden <joden(at)Lee(dot)k12(dot)nc(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stuart Rison <stuart(at)NOJUNK_ludwig(dot)ucl(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? |
| Date: | 1998-07-07 21:07:25 |
| Message-ID: | 81Jul6.155858edt.35713@gateway.lee.k12.nc.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Thanks for that James... I've been trying to work out how to do it for ages!
>
> I have to agree with Richard though, it would be very nice to have it
> within psql. Furthermore, it would be great if such functionality
> could be extended to all \d? queries. In fact, and I'm sure there actually
> is a way to this if you're more knowledgeable than I, since most of these
> \d? queries basically yield a 'SQL' table, wouldn't be nice to be able to
> perform SQL on the (e.g. select * from \df where function = 'int2_text';
> etc.)
>
> Or am I just getting carried away! 8)
>
You know, I think there might be a way to do that, because I believe in some SQL
Databases, you can actually do queries against the catalogs; perhaps you can do
that with Postgress. I don't know for sure though...james
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-07-07 21:48:57 | Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? |
| Previous Message | Bruno LEVEQUE | 1998-07-07 19:31:26 | date and C |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-07-07 21:48:57 | Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1998-07-07 20:56:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? |