Re: Remove hacks for old bad qsort() implementations?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas OSB SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Remove hacks for old bad qsort() implementations?
Date: 2008-03-17 13:30:43
Message-ID: 8195.1205760643@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zeugswetter Andreas OSB SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at> writes:
> How about always adding the TID as last key when using qsort for create
> index ?

I think you misunderstood: that's what we do now. I'm proposing
removing it because I think it's probably useless.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-17 13:34:16 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Some cleanups of enum-guc code, per comments from Tom.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-17 13:29:31 Re: Rewriting Free Space Map