| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
| Cc: | ralough(at)iee(dot)org, "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A little help with transactions, please |
| Date: | 2003-12-10 20:20:29 |
| Message-ID: | 8192.1071087629@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> Richard Lough <ralough(dot)ced(at)dnet(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
>> I find that the update to table A attempts to produce a duplicate
>> primary primary key, and synchronisation with the server is lost.
> I don't think it is normal for failed update statements to cause loss
> of synchronization with the server.
It is not. And if that is what is happening, how does the second update
"proceed" at all? I suspect client-side programming error, but there's
not enough info here to diagnose it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keith C. Perry | 2003-12-10 20:39:11 | Re: [NOVICE] PostgreSQL Training |
| Previous Message | Bret Busby | 2003-12-10 20:10:52 | Re: [NOVICE] PostgreSQL Training |