Re: Asynchronous Trigger?

From: Olleg Samoylov <splarv(at)ya(dot)ru>
To: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous Trigger?
Date: 2018-04-27 10:46:29
Message-ID: 8172161524825989@web45j.yandex.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general





<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Try to look at PGQ from SkyTools.<br />
<br />
<div>On 2018-03-30 01:29, Cory Tucker wrote:<br />
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAG_=8kAdbc_DoJWy11xh5J8b+v-ZWSt3Ty-1Ffdn4scgq3wK6Q(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Is it possible to have the execution of a trigger (or any
function) not block the completion of the statement they are
associated with?</div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div>A pattern I had hoped to implement was to do a quick update
of rows that signaled they needed attention, and then an async
per-row trigger would come and do the maintenance (in this
case, make an expensive materialized view).</div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div>Any suggestions welcome.</div>
<div><br />
</div>
<div>thanks!</div>
<div>--Cory</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br />
</div>

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/html 1009 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Lavoie 2018-04-27 11:39:06 Fwd: Failed rpm package signature checks with reposync
Previous Message Olivier Macchioni 2018-04-27 10:28:31 Re: Locks analysis after-the-fact