Re: [HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vladimir Gordiychuk <folyga(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication
Date: 2017-01-19 21:57:17
Message-ID: 8164.1484863037@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

=?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Sol=C3=B3rzano?= <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> After many tries I get this:
> #0 0x0000000000836950 in exec_bind_message (input_message=0x7ffce81048a0)
> at postgres.c:1562

Hmm ... that line was last touched by ab1f0c822, so I'm betting that
I broke it somehow, but I'm not sure how.

It looks like S_3 might have been parsed from a totally empty source
string? But if that's the trigger, I'd think it'd be entirely trivial
to reproduce.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-01-19 22:01:39 Re: Logical Replication WIP
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-01-19 21:51:02 Re: Improving RLS planning

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jorge Solórzano 2017-01-19 23:31:52 Re: [HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication
Previous Message Jorge Solórzano 2017-01-19 21:31:57 Re: [HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication