Re: Primary Key

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Swan <tswan-lst(at)ics(dot)olemiss(dot)edu>
Cc: "P(dot) Dwayne Miller" <dmiller(at)espgroup(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Primary Key
Date: 2001-06-19 22:50:39
Message-ID: 8157.992991039@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Swan <tswan-lst(at)ics(dot)olemiss(dot)edu> writes:
> AFIAK, it's a legal table creation statement.

The variant I showed is. The original one had an extraneous "ON" in the
FOREIGN KEY clause, and even more to the point all the column
declarations had column name and type name reversed. That's why I was
questioning the syntax ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Naomi Walker 2001-06-19 23:04:17 Backup and Recovery
Previous Message Thomas Swan 2001-06-19 22:37:58 Re: Primary Key