| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL-standard function body |
| Date: | 2020-07-01 23:54:11 |
| Message-ID: | 815268.1593647651@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:58 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> With what other implementations is it compatible?
> Judging by the Wikipedia article[1], it sounds like at least DB2 and
> MySQL/MariaDB are purposely striving for conformance.
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL/PSM
but ... but ... but ... that's about SQL/PSM, which is not this.
Having said that, I wonder whether this work could be repurposed
to be the start of a real SQL/PSM implementation. There's other
stuff in SQL/PSM, but a big part of it is routines that are written
with syntax like this.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2020-07-02 00:04:19 | Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind" |
| Previous Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2020-07-01 23:06:31 | Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode |